There are many committed and sincere individuals in the ‘freedom’ movement who have spent decades trying to work their way through the entanglements and contortions of legalese. It took many years for these seekers to realise that there was a hidden and encoded language layered beneath the seemingly obvious meanings of the words. “Do you understand these charges against you?” has nothing to do with ‘understand’ in relation to comprehension- in legalese, ‘understand’ means ‘stand under’, a legal term meaning that the individual not only agrees to and accepts the charges against them, but that the individual also accepts the jurisdiction of the court as having authority over them. This is a *profoundly* different meaning to the one the ordinary individual believes is being used when they say ‘yes’ to the question. In terms of the controlling mechanisms of the current paradigm, the entire miasm is filled with such ‘weasel words’, words that are designed to bespell or enslave an individual into a situation that, in terms of technicality, they have actually agreed to. It is an entanglement that, if one takes it on face value and seeks to answer in its own territories, is doomed to failure- the freeman and sovereign movement is filled with examples of those who tried to turn the law’s weasel words on itself only to find themselves incarcerated for their efforts and frequently having lost everything in the process.
(more…)

The language of autonomy, the language of heteronomy; language as a tool, language as a weapon. This, for those that may be interested, is why I bother with ‘semantics'; without a form by which ideas can be expressed and explored, without a construct of feedback there is no possibility of enriching and evolving the signal of the Whole. The constant bum rap that verbal expression gets is undeserved in my perspective, because it isn’t the verbal expression that is the problem, it is the unconscious embedded signals of programmed purpose and intention within the verbal expression and words that is the problem.

(more…)

(The following was written in response to an individual who was trying to establish their philosophical superiority in an online discussion by bringing in the concept of ‘no-mind’ to a space that was discussing consciousness as vital to evolution of Being. The heteronomy in their engagement with the perspectives of others and their attitude of spiritual superiority prompted me to write. )

Autonomy is ridiculously easy to lose when certain language is used. I am endeavouring to point out the buried heteronomy in particular language. I am not an expert at it by any means- I live in a particular kind of mindspace and am fully aware that I can also inadvertently fall into a subtle element of heteronomy my Self, which is why I use triangulation, the multiple perspective. There is buried heteronomy in the language you used in the comment. I recognise that my comments regarding hijacking could be taken as snarky *and* my comments still stand: I have observed many threads that open up a discussion about unrelated topics be swallowed up by philosophical entanglement and convolution; frequently the ‘silent/ no mind’ platform is the vehicle used to achieve this.

(more…)

When one holds a baby in one’s arms, it is clear that there is no conflict within their body. As they grow, it’s clear that they are *in* their body until they are frightened or trained out of it somehow. How does this happen? By the external influence of those around them. Conflict has as its roots a fundamental condition of opposition between two states- like magnets pushing against each other. This is not the natural state of a child. This has been demonstrated by the observation of children raised in native cultures that have a laid back approach to their children and their life; the more heavily invested in any particular paradigm- in native cultures, this tends towards heavy handed taboo/religious systems, external systems designed to create a specific kind of behaviour and thinking within the individual in such a way as to restrict, modulate, constrict or control in some way the individual’s natural, free flowing state of Being.

(more…)

Here is where the previous writings on sui generis that I’ve done kick in. Sui generis autonomy is the recognition that just as one is one’s own jurisdiction and authority, so are *all* their own authority *which means ‘do no harm’ is also part of the mix*. There can be no true autonomy without the deep recognition of the right of the Other to determine their own path and live into their own authority also- without this, autonomy simply because dictatorial dominance no matter where in the picture it is placed. Any time any group by whatever means acts as the authority for another Being that has a degree of competence, this is heteronomy and it carries the seeds of the virus, *always*. There is no way to create a virus free world on one side of the equation while holding heteronomy in the other. Heteronomy is dictatorship and the removal of another’s free will in some way or another. Always. It is an incursion into another’s sui generis, which is why the principle of ‘do no harm’ is embedded into true autonomy- we cannot invade the space of another in such a way that invades their integrity.

(more…)