songsfortheotherkind.com

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthr ... post451903

This slipperiness is exactly the aspect of the virus that I first saw as a child; I was puzzled as to the apparent inability of the adults around me to see this slitherin' thing that slid and hissed in their ears, this oily blackness with eyes that turned and looked at me, recoiling in rage when it realised I was watching it, could see. From that moment the assaults began in earnest, decades of attacks in my sleep, sometimes leaving me battered and scarred in the morning; I've woken up with bite marks that encompassed both sides of my upper torso, I've had the healed scars of knife wounds, shotgun blasts, beatings, being pinned through the body with swords, I've been set on fire with a flame that caused the pain but wouldn't destroy the body. I've experienced attacks while in physical paralysis, constantly saw, heard and experienced things that others couldn't, so my idea of 'reality' became very slippery in itself- I stood on the bridge between chaos and order with no clear sense of Self, no sure place to put my foot, no clear guideposts within or without-

and all this was happening at the ripe old age of seven.

I learned that it was my non-humanness that seemed to make it easy for me to see the 'matrix', the shifting energetic darkness that fed the system. I learned so much about the mind virus through the hell that was my childhood. The virus contorted and twisted itself inside my mother so that it would use her to physically attack me in my waking world- those attacks put me on lifesupport twice, caused me head injuries that couldn't be repaired until kinesiology was invented, once had me on the ground bleeding from the ears from being kicked in the head and hovering above my body as I watched her kicking my ribs until at least one of them broke. My childhood was a dosey-do of trying to decide whether to stay or leave, wondering if the whole thing had been a huge mistake.

Gradually I took up my swords in my dream world and spent 11 years of almost nightly being transported to an underground train station in the US somewhere (I used to think it was NY, but I could never tell for certain given that I never left the station): I would appear, swords in hand, and do battle with a horde of something nasties, with companions at my side that I was aware of but could never see. I now understand that these were my guides, ever present, helping me survive whatever forces were trying to eliminate me, but back then I didn't understand these things clearly because my receptive mind was already damaged through trauma and the constant energetic assault.

The nights when I didn't wake up in the underground, I had nightmares that would wake me up screaming until I learned not to do that (because my mother would hit me if I did), so I learned to wake up paralysed and silent. That's how I learned to live- paralysed and silently observing the slitherin thing that coiled itself around everything I could see.

Only I am a stubborn and tenacious creature and I'm really really good at systems hacking- I love that there is a language now for what I do. I had nothing to do but watch the thing, and map it; it thought I was beaten for awhile but I was just watching, with sideways eyes, what it was doing. And I learned and learned and learned, mainly from observing what it was doing inside *me*. I systematically dismantled my own thinking, over and over again, my own processes, watching the virus morph and twist inside me, gradually pulling out of the mesmer that I'd been spelled with so that I could begin to work with my own gifts and energies.

I learned the slippery nature of the virus was absolutely supported by the deliberate fracturing of my Self that had been pointed at me. I was on the bridge again, watching the virus move and reshape while I patiently called all the pieces of my Self back to me (decades later I heard the term 'soul integration' which kind of expressed the process that had by then become constant). The virus morphed again within me and began to attack my physical body; allergic to the 21st century, constantly ill, befogged, exhausted and wondering if it was all worth it, but I had my children by then and I loved them passionately, so I refused to lie down no matter how many times I was beaten to the floor. I used to hate that aspect of me, I hated that I couldn't quit. It's one of the things I love now.

I watched it all working within and without, watching the world be the glove puppet, individuals engaging in bizarre rituals and strokings that were nothing more than exchanges of virus, swapping hosts so that it could replenish itself with different energy from a different Being, a bunch of zombies walking around utterly unaware that they were already dead, reanimated corpses designed to play host to a virus that cannot function without a willing host. No matter what conversations I engaged in there were only hostile at worst or bewildered at best responses; I'd learned as a child that adults did not react well at all to having the virus boundaries triggered and I relearned those lessons again and again as a young adult, until I understood in my Self that I wasn't here for humans; I was here for Otherkind, in whatever form, and mostly I was here because of what I could do with the virus.

So I pointed my efforts at that. I turned around and faced it down in me, daring it to kill me, to shut me down, and it turned and ran, with me thundering after it like a roaring dragon, and it disappeared. I learned to grow bigger inside and my first efforts were indeed ferocious, born of my anguish, my fear, my fury at the constant attack; I eventually moved through all that, back and forth, until I was able to walk back into the sanctuary of my Essence, where I found my stillness and my aikido, my Jedi 'nothing to see here', my cloak of invisibility. Then things got really interesting, because I could do a Neo, enter into the virus itself in isolated memes and dissolve them from the *inside*. I spent a decade doing this without knowing exactly what it was that I was doing- I can remember the shock of watching The Matrix for the first time and seeing so much of the energetic reality of my life up there on the screen; I knew then that there must be others, that at some point this work that I'd been doing would become part of a bigger dialogue and connection, meeting up to hold space of higher vibration within the chaos, points of connection linking up to gradually lift the frequency above the virus, because that's how viruses and parasites are destroyed- frequency. I knew that long, long before the external world started producing evidence for what I'd seen; although it's been cool to have the affirmation, I'd begun to see the positive effects within me the more I raised my own frequency. I gradually put down all my weapons, refused to fight, refused to be baited, and I'd just hold the space of my Essence, whatever I could get in contact with, and I'd simply sit and look the virus in the eye while I did it- and I saw the flickering of fear there.

Now everything I see in the world is the virus striving to hold ground against the rising vibration, the interconnectedness, the evolution and consciousness that has been rising and rising for the past 50 years, accelerating and expanding. It doesn't matter that there are billions who are still the walking dead, or that there seems to be so much power in the hands of the corruption; I've lived through my own version of 'there's nothing you can do to stop me, so you may as well curl up and die now!'- I have lived in that space and learned that it was all nothing but a lie, everything the virus ever said to me, and so I see that the lies played out big are still lies. I know that the virus fears any Being that can hold space, hold the frequency, and I have seen that for me, this is the best thing, the most powerful thing, that I can do here and now- consciously be a transmitter of the frequency that sends the virus mad.

Here's what I know about this: being a carrier of that signal is also going to send all those still deeply embedded in the virus mad also. I have never been able to see a mass 'awakening' because so many are so deeply embedded in the virus signal that, like Morpheus said, we just don't try to wake those ones up, the shock to the mind is too great. I've witnessed first hand what being triggered beyond comfort zone did to my Self and those around me; I've observed trauma modes and responses and learned that for some, waking up is worse than being one of the living dead and they'll kill to keep that state. So I don't look to 'waking up the masses', it's not my thing- what *is* my thing is communicating about the virus to those that have the signal already in them, so that we can start leveling each other up, calling each other on elements of the virus that we're blind to, getting as clear as we can and being holders of that signal, homeopathy style, for the entire paradigm.

Gaia has no need of catastrophic events to get rid of the virus- she just raises her vibration, her frequency, and the virus eventually becomes so destabilised and psychotic that it begins to attack itself- which is exactly what I've been observing is happening on an escalating scale. This is why I can't get into the 'oh look, HERE is corruption' or 'YET MORE EVIDENCE OF blahblahblah'- getting caught up in the noise of the virus itself is no way for me personally to be able to do something useful in response. Those that are actually consciously hacking the virus from the external, bringing the hidden into the light, aren't interested in better voting systems, or more 'user friendly' economic platforms or any other way for making the rotten corpse look and smell better: I have learned to ghost by those who insist that if I'm not out there PROTESTING and DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT and BRINGING ON THE REVOLUTION then I'm just sitting back and letting the PTB do their thing. I've learned that these individuals don't like to hear my perspective on revolution- why would I want to do something that is based on going around in circles?- and they sure don't want to hear my perspective on the energetic aspect of what is going on. So I ghost past this now, stay out of all the places that yell and shriek at me that they NEED MY ENERGY, because I know that I have much better places to point my energy.

The virus is now at a stage where the speed of morphing required to stay on top of the destabilisation is becoming greater than it can manage. It needs hosts that are relatively non-resistant, compliant- it has certain inbuilt responses for those that do not comply, which we've seen over and over again- force, domination, control (modern psychiatry, schooling and social programming/memes are the most powerful against young creatives these days) and if necessary, death- but it doesn't have the speed that comes with being connected to Life, the swift evolution that can happen from being connected to our Essence and what our experience is of that which Created us (however that is for us as an individual)- artificial systems are never able to fully emulate the natural system on which they are modeled, because natural systems are connected by energy to the Field, the continuum of infinite possibilities- and the virus is not connected to that. Neither is religion. That's why *all* the systems created from the virus- which is itself a control mechanism of those that made homo sapiens in the first place- need input from Beings: there is no life there, no ability to truly Create in connection to the life force itself. It's all artificial, second-rate compared to what Gaia, the Universal Mind, Source, the Field, however you see it, has Created.

For the past 12 months the virus has been trying, through physical means linked to booby traps in my psyche, to prevent me from embracing a major expansion in awareness and Being. I've been slammed with toxicity and adrenaline overloads that have resulted in me having some of the most distressing physical experiences of my life- and I've learned, and learned, and cleared out the booby traps, often after I've stood on one and experienced the result. That's what booby traps *are*, double sided coins in every moment where we get to choose which side we go for, always present to either ensnare us or give us the mirror that we need to take the next step, and the next. My booby traps are still there *and* my aikido with them has had an excellent workout- the past 24 hours have given me the key that I was working towards, it always comes back to being willing to let fear drop away, fall away, being willing to let go the debts that I'm holding against others- even the debts against the virus itself- so that I can move more freely and with greater speed through the space. The virus holds all its debts, it NEEDS indebtedness to function, it creates shame and guilt and fear, the fiat currency of the emotional world, the monopoly money of no value: if I hold onto the debts I think others owe *me*, on whatever level, then the invisible threads of indebtedness entangle me. The whole virus system is a reflection of what we as individuals are doing on an energetic, etheric, emotional scale- that's been known for ages and yet still, it's so difficult for individuals to let go their own debt records against others while they want others to release them.

Many spiritual books hint at these things, because they have been tweaked and assisted by energies that actually wanted to give homo sapiens a chance to evolve; those energies have nothing to do with the supposed 'gods' within them, but that's my realm's perspective; suffice to say that much of what we're seeing now was recorded previously as a Clue, although the lens one looks through the clues at definitely affect the interpretation and experience. For me, I'm seeing all the pieces falling together, the debt and financial disaster mirroring the energetic and emotional debt individuals force themselves and each other into, refusing to let go, to release, to fall into abundance and embrace what's really there. Threads on this forum- we NEED to depopulate, we NEED to do this, THIS Is what NEEDS to happen, all the fears and lack perspectives rising up, the virus desperately trying to get everyone back into line. For me, it's a signal to talk about the virus MORE, to remind my Self as I search for the spores, Nausicaa style, moving through the landscapes of my internal and external realms, focused on holding the frequency as consistently and as high as I can in every moment knowing what that does to the virus within and without. The more the hidden thing is spoken of, the less powerful it becomes, moment by moment, and that is one of my Big Things in this phase of existence.

Thank you so much for being the catalyst for this exploration- I did not know I was going to get up and write this at 6:30 in the morning. I think we're beginning to see some very very uneasy farmers indeed...

_________________
"For every lie I unlearn, I learn something new"- Ani DiFranco

Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far they can go. ~ TS Elliot

I have been deeply exploring the Monsanto codes lately, in exploration of some of the situations I mentioned ..... the deep physical fear of death after personally experiencing it. I am profoundly curious regarding this experience of the exercising of some kind of external authority over my physical Being and this has been leading me into some interesting observations of other systems that are in operation.

Yesterday I was engaged in the exercise of deliberately keeping my lower chakras from blowing out. For those unfamiliar with what I'm talking about, this is what I've observed: the heteronomy cannot tolerate any autonomy. Heartspace (autonomy) in children is where they operate from, so one of the first things heteronomy does is to make it too painful and frightening for children to operate from heartspace. It uses its tried and true tactics to achieve this: humiliation, shaming, diminishing and trivialising of the other's perspective and experience, belittling, domination, fear, force; the child becomes frightened on a deep level and cuts off from its own heart centred knowing (which is the horrendous and death inducing process described in such brutal clarity in The Golden Compass books). As the heart is the intended space to engage and communicate from this leaves a conundrum for the Being- communication is still necessary, so where to communicate from? So the child looks to its society and to the external 'authority': how members of the paradigm engage with each other is a hideous extension of the lower three chakra energies.

Since I've observed this, it clicked into place for me a vital component of what was happening around others that I couldn't 'see' and was still being distressed by; I can sense and experience the extending tendrils from others that happen as soon as I engage them for any reason. I can see it energetically; it's like Neo waking up and seeing all the other pods, with their hooked in physical batteries, and his feeling the leads plugged into his own body. If I drop into my other sets of eyes I can actually 'see' it happening and it's surreal and ugly in the extreme. As an aside it's also helped explain why there is such an addiction to gluten and sugar, both being substances which assist in weakening these lower chakras by creating disturbances and diseases in the gut and organs. No wonder so many westerners are walking around with distended bellies- when one sees what snakes out of that area of their body to hook into one another, it makes sense.

I have been experimenting with moving through the matrix while keeping my lower chakra doors closed. Here's one of my first observations: it makes others really nervous and twitchy. I can move through spaces as though others simply are not there, because essentially they aren't; as soon as I close the lower chakra gates their signal goes really really muted, as if they become part of some kind of ghost world. At first I found it really disconcerting, because it felt like I'd just lost my ability to connect with them in any way, yet as I continued to expand and explore the signal I discovered that this wasn't quite what is happening: what's actually present is that I have dropped out of the space of the signal that is being exchanged and I am outside the feeding.

I have been amazed at the strength of the undertow I experience when I am holding this space. Literally everything around me when I'm out and about is designed to entice me into an engagement in the noise; I walk around observing in wonder the sheer effort and energy that goes into the creation of the distraction circus, every interaction and engagement acting like an energy surge for the feeding mechanisms, which vibrate and flicker in a way that is so repugnant that I fail to find the words to describe it. It's utterly outside the living and natural world.

I walk differently when I close the gates to my lower chakras; my gait becomes more of a fluid glide and I am naturally much more still around others. I've discussed with Borden before the strange twitchiness I've observed humans engaging in, the occurence of which was actually highlighted for me in a book about vampires; a vampire was educating a new vampire regarding being able to hide more easily around humans and the advice was 'move. You must train yourself to twitch and fidget occasionally, to move when movement is not necessary, because humans find stillness unnatural and disturbing.' I don't know if the native peoples find such stillness unnatural- from my reading they do, that stillness is one of the ways they mark a Being from the otherrealms. I find that keeping my lower chakra gates closed creates a stillness and connection to a 'beneath' signal that is really exquisite to engage with. I move through the spaces and noise in a really different way; for a start I can no longer hear the external noise of the shopping centres and individuals in them. Sitting here now recalling yesterday's time spent in the shopping mall this strikes me profoundly; normally I equate such places with a distressing amout of noise but my memories of yesterday are of time spent in physical and energetic silence. It's really intriguing: it *is* possible to move out of the signal. I recall moving through crowds where absolutely no eye contact of any kind was made despite my looking for it- the only ones that would look directly at me were babies and small children.

This exploration is giving me fascinating feedback regarding the autonomy signal; I have never had such clear experience of what it is like to be truly free of the external authority and constriction. This is an entirely different space and I am beginning to use it in my writing and interactions here in the forum; I'm seeing a vast difference between the energy I extend to those with whom I consciously choose to engage with more intimacy and those that I do not choose to extend this to, and this is despite my previous awareness of this energy. There are simply new avenues and experiences opening to me as a result of refusing to be fed on by any individual. This seems to bring certain agents into my sphere, which I experience as the squiddy function: wherever autonomy is discussed or the energy is held, the agents for the virus are going to head to the space with the purpose and intention of getting things back in their 'proper' place by any means necessary. I have experienced that a few times now; it's not important to me that others see it for what it is *to me*, it's up to me to figure out what I do about it, because I know what is wanted is for me to cave in and give my autonomy away again. Pfffffffffffffffffffft.
-- songsfortheotherkind

I guess if the sentinels are showing up again I must be doing *something* to bug the system: the next useless thing would be to put too much energy into dissolving the sentinels. Huh. There's an interesting consideration: what does one do with the sentinels?

I wonder what the energy's equivalent of an EMP charge is- although, is that really the best way to do it? Hmmm...

Ok. I have seen it alive in an individual's eyes more than once and it's creepy and disgusting in the extreme: there is an oily deadness that momentarily turns the individual host into a true zombie and it's not something that sits well with the Life in me, to put it mildly. In the etheric realm the virus exists as an increasingly sentient thing- not yet at Voldemort level, it will never be like that, but it has a primal cunning and awareness, although it's hard to describe in 3D terms. It's definitely sentient. This is a result of something that happens in the evolutionary Consciousness realms, as I have experienced and observed them. Here's how it goes: there is a lot of talk these days about the power of intention and focus, about the creative power of words, about the awesome amount of creative energy within one individual, let alone billions. In my history this is the 6th iteration of homo sapiens, the fourth since the anunnaki got the species to actually be viable. The first two iterations were hideous, 28 Days Later style creatures: there are reasons the deep seated mythologies exist regarding zombie style behaviours etc. It's in the collective unconsciousness. It's one of the reasons the virus mythologies regarding 'falls from grace' etc are so effective; on a profoundly deep level, humans know- instinctively and uneasily, with nightmare level primal anxiety- that there's *something* wrong in them somewhere. This is evidenced all over the mythologies- they are afraid of *something* they cannot articulate and it's constantly externalised, when it actually comes from within them. The christian bible even explicitly states that humans 'made in the image of their makerS'- elohim, plural- and on a profoundly biological level, the corruption of their makers whispers to them in ways that speak in nightmares and imagery, in unspoken horrors lurking outside the safety of the circle of the fire, externally in the bewildering hideousness of their own cultural and behavioural baselines. They do not naturally create beauty; there is a constant turning towards death cult fascination, despite their own puzzlement at this.

Made in the image of their makers. And their makers learned really quickly to fear them. Do you know anunnaki don't like fire, for instance? It's one of the reasons Lucifer/Prometheus is so loathed in the religions they created- the Lucifer/Liliths both could cope with fire *and* they gave it to the homo sapiens, which had benefits on many levels.

All this is buried in the mythologies from all over the world- constant stories of angry god/s raining down destruction and cataclysm for the sin of 'rebellion', for thinking itself as species equal to that which made it, the growing suspicion that not only was it equality but was actually a superiority, a greater evolution than had been counted on- the conversation at the tower of Babel: 'with a common language and these abilities, what will they not be able to accomplish and become like us?' and so the languages were confused, to prevent the evolution that the hybrids carried within them.

So the virus was created between the third and fourth iterations, really kicking in during the fourth. It was originally created when it became clear the anunnaki had made something they were going to lose control of really quickly, due to the unforeseen effects of the Otherkind signal. Originally it was a vast sight more crude and brutal than what it is now, because the full effects of the Otherkind gene splicing hadn't really become widespread. Originally it was a mind control program embedded within a primitive viral coating, fairly simply and brutally enforced by innoculation and terrorism: there was also a distortion of the construction of the original brain configuration so that the mind became far more programmable and vulnerable to the external authority, in combination with religion and the other control mechanisms that were put in place- controlled education, governance, social structures that made it dangerous to be different. Bog standard totalitarianism, really. But the Otherkind genetics were the spanner in the works that caused the whole control system to go pear shaped.

Originally, the first iterations were made using mostly anunnaki genetics and some genes from various Gaian based lifeforms that Gaia had been developing as expression of her own evolutionary Art. The mixing of the genetics didn't go well- the Life signal contained in the Gaian based genes caused a strong negative reaction from the devolution signal present in the anunnaki genetics and it created a species that basically looked like Reavers, mutilating each other and themselves in an attempt to remove the signal that was causing so much internal dissonance. The anunnaki already knew they were fundamentally allergic to this system- the frequency here drives them nuts, which is why high Otherkind/Life signal in an individual can drive a group of stronger anunnaki signal homo sapiens utterly berserk- it's part of the pitchfork and torches reaction, on a biological level, just like the early homo sapiens tried to tear themselves apart; even when it was possible to implant an embryo in a female it would tear its own body apart trying to get rid of the embryo and it wasn't until the third and fourth iterations that the combination was found whereby the homo sapiens could breed- but that was because of the introduction of the Otherkind genetics, so it was a double edged sword in ways the anunnaki were scrambling to compensate for. It still is- there never have been 'pure' homo sapiens here because they self destruct- and I cannot begin to describe the horror of that, 28 Days Later triggered me so badly in some ways- so it's never been a case of 'we homo sapiens, YOU 'alien invaders'; the genetics have always been mixed and without that the homo sapiens would have been a failed experiment tossed into the lab trashcan like an aborted baby left to die. What a charming species this isn't.

Thus the anunnaki turned their focus for new genetic material on the Otherkind, the many other species that were already here and doing their thing via the numerous Gateways and entry points that had been consciously and carefully crafted, tuned to the sometimes specific requirements of particular biological configurations and expressions. Sentient Beings who are also aware energetically occasionally stumble across these places and instantly realise they are a place tuned to something profoundly Other, often is ways that cause them to back out of the space if they don't carry the resonant hybridisation of that particular energy; those that *do* carry that particular signal will find it attracts them in powerful and inexplicable ways, sometimes moving them to profound emotional and psychological upheaval and catharsis that can sometimes even lead to physical transformation on deep levels. They generally cannot adequately explain or describe what has happened, often simply stating 'it felt like I had come Home' and on a genetic and signal level this is accurate. Since the homo sapiens have come to dominate the landscape and be the primary generators of the collective signal here, many Otherkind can no longer manifest here because the dissonance carried within homo sapiens is so excruciatingly noisy they're simply too painful to be around. It's one of the reasons the Gateways are mostly closed now, or at least heavily guarded, and why there is a quarantine on this planet that will never allow homo sapiens or the anunnaki to leave this particular system. Never. They are the worst energetic virus ever seen and the rest of the multiverse isn't waiting at all to welcome them with open arms; they're making absolutely sure that only those who are willing to evolve, to move beyond the low vibration addictions and embrace the Life signal, are welcomed out of the barriers. There's a lot in the anunnaki bible about those barriers and the way out of them, because the Anun known as Jesus knew exactly what the mindset of the anunnaki was like- they were, after all, his own ancestors, even if they were far removed from him energetically and biologically due to his hybridisation. That's the Lucifer/Lilith signal, I've written a bit of what that was about. Suffice now to say that there are many allusions within the world's religions and philosophies that point to what I'm saying, just all skewed towards the anunnaki perspective: we all know the lie needs to be wrapped around a grain of truth before it will be swallowed. There are links all over the planet that talk about this ancient history- there's just a great deal of interest in arguing the details, rather than wondering what the substance of it all is.

That's the part that truly interests and engages me, the 'what it lead to' bit- it's no big news *to me* to point to my Self and say 'Otherkind hybrid' because the hybrid part is like 'uh, d'uh' when it comes to sentient Beings on this planet and I hybridised my Self, deliberately, eons ago, as part of my work here - sure, at some point impossibly and irrelevantly way back when, my physical avatar of choice may have come from some distinct genome that had nothing to do with Gaia and the signal here, but the Otherkind signal I had before the anunnaki has been transformed by my work here since the Question became priority; in order to keep coming here I eventually had to incarnate into avatars that carried the homo sapiens signal and I went through my baptism of pain with regards that (which is the jangle Otherkind carry here, in part because their signal knows death is a crock and utterly unnatural and the resetting is utterly distressing both ways, so it takes a LOT of commitment to the cause to even keep returning here- this realm is NOT for the fragile, and even those considered utterly fragile here are certainly not considered so in the realms this project is being conducted from)- now I am aware that I'm hybrid, I've crafted this intentionally all along and the particular combination I now carry has a very specific purpose and intention embedded in it. I know there's Others out there who have precisely the same focus and awareness, which is one of the reasons I'm even bothering with all this work- it's a Calling, like the Quickening, in a way- and if you know what 'quicken' means, it's utterly relevant and specific. I am increasingly distilling that signal with a very specific purpose and intent.

The conflict, from the anunnaki standpoint, is that the Life signal *carries creative power*- those who truly know what they're doing can manifest anything, including Life itself- although the Life one is a doozy and while it's not something that's part of the run of the mill abilities, given enough distillation of the signal itself, a Being can become a Creator on that level. Most don't aspire to that level, because frankly being on the cutting edge of cocking about in the other manifestations of the signal is just way too much fun to get all focused on that level- and that's perfect in itself.

When the anunnaki created the virus, they once again miscalculated the effects of the Life signal on their creation- it initially seemed like nothing more than a simple construct, with a rigid set of parameters and operating limits.
-- songsfortheotherkind

And *that* was always going to go well, wasn't it. One thing about the anunnaki- they have an unwavering dedication to never learning from their history, no matter which dimension it's in, theirs or here- there's stuff in their pre-Gaian history that points to the reasons why their universe was collapsing and it had partly to do with just this tendency. Hmm, what other species behaves like that? And just like their makers, they too don't think that's going to have ultimate extinction at the end of it. But I digress.

The issue that came up with the virus itself had to do with a number of converging factors: the increasing distilling of the hybridisation over the long term- high Otherkind genes sought out other high Otherkind, regardless of the diversity of Otherkind signal itself, while high homo sapiens/anunnaki sought out its own and gradually a separation began, echoed in the myriads of religious and spiritual texts, over and over indicating that at some point in the future a permanent separation was going to occur because the two signals are fundamentally, energetically and experientially incompatible. This fundamental incompatibility is not a philosophical one, it's a biological one, the difference between the savagery of the homo sapiens and the gentle unwarlike natures of the Neanderthals, who would have been utterly wiped out had not interventions occurred. They exist still, some choosing to remain in physical form here on the planet in remote and hidden areas in order to carry the original Gaian signal in the face of the homo sapiens signal, while others took the offer of refuge in the Otherrealms and have been quietly evolving in their own unique ways, with as much or as little interaction as they have wished, while they, like the rest of us, waited to see how the Question was going to resolve itself. So the distillation of signal was one factor on the virus- because the Otherkind signal has had great creative power *and* no clarity with which to wield it. Losing one's memory in order to incarnate here was one of the downsides of interacting with the human signal- to come in too complete caused great distress and incompatibility in the early days and it's been a huge effort to get the homo sapiens biology to level up enough to handle a strong Otherkind signal. Now, one of the interesting elements of the process is that some are actively hacking through the limiter codes so that the Otherkind genetics can become the dominant signal- there are *also* many mythologies and cultural tales designed to restrict and make that endeavour taboo- but we're dissolving those too, so that's weakening.

All over the planet the anunnaki and virus hold is weakening- but the virus has been driven to the point of extinction before only to rise again from the faintest of fertile threads and the lessons have been learned from this, to distill into the resolve that Beings like me express: there can be no compromise with the virus signal. None. Its nature is to constantly rise up and recreate itself in its next evolution- that's what all viruses *do*, they evolve and adapt for *their own* survival, and this virus is founded absolutely in a dedication to extinction of the Life signal. There's no transforming this. I don't even engage in such discussions, because I don't have the time for them- others can engage in useless carousel discussions about transforming the dead into something living and in my realms that's called zombification. It never goes well, despite what Fido might suggest. I don't choose to waste my time trying to point out the utterly obvious to those who cannot learn from the past and at best they'll get an abrupt and staccato history lesson in 'been there and tried that here, here, here, here and here, it didn't work, why do you think doing the same thing *again* is going to get a different result?'. It doesn't go down well with the 'all we need is love and things are going to work out' crowd, but then not much does- certainly not a horned, pointy eared and fanged perspective, because we all know what looking like *that* means.

So, the anunnaki set up this virus, and it worked for awhile- and then the Otherkind signal started rising and the *creative energy* started rising. The anunnaki were at first delighted and took no time at all figuring out how to harvest this unexpected largesse and at different times it fueled some quite powerful anunnaki societies and technologies, with the eventual resultant collapse into rubble because, uh, hellooooooo, anunnak- and it the midst of all the mayhem, constant attacks on the Anun and communities where the Otherkind signal was strong and other upheavals, there was a deeper, subtly coalescing signal that the anunnaki missed- but the *virus* didn't, because it was built to *adapt*.

I've been writing since I got up and it's now time for me to get ready and head out the door to the fire festival, where one of my sons is fire twirling tonight. I will write again when I get home.

Now you know why this is going to be so much easier in the you tube film versions.
-- songsfortheotherkind

Burn the Witch syndrome.

These writings were done in a thread that is going to get buried because it has been closed. The elements of these are important for me in the fostering of effective open source creativity, so I'm tweaking them a little and keeping them here in the Pub for reference and discussion.

As in any situation that involves two different parties, a third party coming in with nothing more than a glossy and vague understanding of the situation can really contribute nothing of value to the matter: aide workers in other countries learned this lesson over a long period of time from the 1960s attitude of going in thinking that *they* knew what was necessary for all concerned, to the more long range view held now; many modern aide workers these days actually live in the communities they are servicing for several years, keeping their mouths mostly shut and opening their ears, eyes and hearts, learning which are the *important* questions to ask and which are simply pre-loaded with assumption. Great work has been done with this approach- effective, beneficial to the locals and carrying the signal of true transformation. The old way simply created more issues- ever heard of the 'Green Revolution'?

The Pub is a community that has evolved in the time it has been operational. There is a context embedded language that has already evolved here, because that's what the individuals gathered here are, in part, interested in. Things that happen in the pub happen within the context of the Pub community and a brief perusal of a skinny portfolio of papers- such is skimming through a few posts- isn't going to give a platform from which any can speak informedly and with insight on a complex matter. Sometimes ongoing situations result in a lot of discussion and platform shifting in the Pub, involving quite a number of the Pub community. It is an eclectic and multiperspectived hologram, this Pub.

I'm speaking Pub language here. Every member of the Pub Club will understand pretty much exactly what I just said and will resonate, to one degree or another, with the essence and foundational concepts I'm basing these remarks on. I'm not saying that to brag in any way, I'm saying it to demonstrate that, say, an English speaker from suburban Somewhere, with a fresh degree in Sociology clutched in their hand, has come to the rainforest on an far distant planet where the natives speak a local dialect, have utterly different customs, history and perspectives- and the sociology major think they know what's going on.

In many situations where evolution is the experience it's really, really, really easy- and, in fact, modern society's default position- to attack and destroy the messenger, rather than consider the message in what the messenger brought directly or indirectly to the situation. It's a combination of first brain (I don't use the term reptilian, it's erroneous) and limbic brain reactivity without any significant neocortex function- what I call "Burn the Witch" mode. It's part of the pitchfork wielding mob mentality, except these days it's done verbally. The foundational platform is the same- squash anything that doesn't fit the dominant society within any area- science, art, education, religion, politics, society and forums- they *all* mirror each other in their reaction to anything that doesn't fit the prescribed parameters.

I am utterly disinterested in this recursive and closed system behaviour. It makes me look many things to many individuals, few of which are flattering: as it happens I don't give a rats about social memes and conventions, I'm interested in what is beyond that because the issues that currently plague the sentient Beings of this planet aren't going to go away by tweaking and refurbishing the same paradigms that create the issues.

An individual may have absolutely NO interest in this perspective whatsoever, in which case they will continue to hold their views, perceptions and assumptions, which they are *entirely* within their autonomy to do. I'm not interested in engaging in personality differences. If, however, there is an interest in perspectives without personality, then perhaps what I have written regarding various topics will be of some interest and co-creative exploration can ensue. I am open to this and I have no problem if any individual has the former, 'no thanks', preference, providing it doesn't turn into Burn the Witch, in which case I will respond if and as necessary.

Mmm, this was never about personalities- it's about operating platforms that have profoundly different perspectives and expressions. Personally I have seen the heteronomy flare ups and reactivity as a micro-macro exploration, on many levels, and I still do- I'm really not interested in 'personalities', because there's no evolution in that - and my personal view is that without some kind of *profound* EVOLUTION things look rather grim for the sentient Beings on this planet.

This is supposed to be a forum for evolutionaries, yet as soon as evolution comes up in a form that the general population isn't comfortable with, the default 'burn the witch' position comes to the fore- and from an evolutionary standpoint that default position springs from extinction signal. I can handle the flak- heck, if I couldn't I would have been drummed out of this forum long ago with the rigid social mores and thought policing that operate beneath the surface here- but the flak doesn't generally bother me: I grew up being beaten the crap out of by my peers in the schoolyard because at 8 I knew words like antidisestablishmentarianism, could read at a year 12 level and these things threatened their world even if they couldn't articulate why, so they knew exactly how to deal with that. I know I'm short, weird looking, and physically scarred, so the physical insults don't work, the personal insults don't work, the insults hidden behind convoluted intellectualism or pseudo- spirituality don't work- so the *only thing left* is to either consider intelligently what I'm talking about, discuss the platform I'm pointing to, consider the possibilities I'm bringing to the table, rather than looking at the messenger, making personality based judgements and trying to set fire to them. I am *made* of fire, so that's not going to work either.

I'm not saying I'm everyone's cup of tea- I have *zero interest* in being so, it's honestly and truthfully not my thing- it does feel yuck to be abused or maligned, sure, *and* if that was going to shut me up it would have done so by now; I process the yuck, take a few deep breaths, reconfigure and keep following my path. I'm not interested in those who want to respond to me with insults and potshots at my personality, they truly are a dime a dozen and represent nothing but the dominant paradigm; I am looking for individuals who can think outside the boxes, who will help me refine and enrich this platform I'm building, who are interested in *creating* something new, not in clinging to what has been because that's all they've got. I keep saying, and I will KEEP saying, agreement, homogeny and consensus are NOT necessary- there are better elements to work with, AUTONOMY being a foundational one.

If someone doesn't like me personally that's totally understandable, I'm weird! I'm outspoken! I don't play 'nice' a lot of the time, because *to me* that's a waste of time: this does not mean I don't care about anything or anyone because were this true I wouldn't be on this forum - and there are those who take what I talk about and reword it so that they don't have to deal with what I'm talking about because of the way I express my Self. I have *zero interest* in being a guru, god or geisha for *anyone*- so there's really no issue for me there. I don't even care if what I'm talking about interests or suits others- that's their autonomy in action, which I fully resonate to- it gets really tedious when any individual equates 'I don't resonate with either you as an individual or with what you talk about' with 'and that gives me the right to malign you to others, tear you down any way I see fit, write posts that spread my negative judgements as if these are absolute truth and make a point of pointing negative energy at you whenever I can'- *that* is just the same old controller paradigm's tactics, and I'll call them as I see them, not because I'm interested in personality conflict but because the tactics they are employing are part of the foundation for every act of terrorism, brutality and war on the planet- and THAT matters to me. Calling something what it is is the first act of empowerment, *in my experience*.

That's who I am, that's what I'm about. The Burn the Witch is something that is deeply embedded in the dominant paradigm and slithers beneath the skin of almost all Beings- my Self included, although it's not about witches, obviously- and I have to keep a close eye on my Self to make sure that crap isn't running. This is why I focus the way that I do- evolution simply cannot happen if every time a New Thing emerges it's hit on the head and killed because 'it don't look like Us'. Of course it doesn't- it's a New Thing.

Viva la evolution!
-- songsfortheotherkind

Someone commented:
Language, especially in a text based format without the nuance of body language or the opportunity to look the speaker in the eye, has a great potential of being misunderstood or misinterpreted. If you don't grok already what the other is going on about, then tread carefuly, and be slow to label the others expression with any of the watch words.

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
This would be lovely. I agree with you regarding the difficulties involved in online language, which is why I'm endeavouring to establish some baseline platforms given the particular perspective I'm coming from. I'm continuing to write, despite the criticisms and personal attacks. It bemuses me that if those who disagree with me so strongly really wanted to they could simply exercise their autonomous right to ignore me. I don't go into threads that don't appeal to or interest me- why would I do that? So if individuals have an issue with what I'm writing, what is wrong with simply utterly ignoring me?

Someone commented:
The truth is, unless another is perfectly understood, beforehand, then to call something virus, or hereronomous, without being so careful, is potentially to tread all over anothers autonomy, which is essentially an aspect of the very thing, heteronomy.

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
I deliberately posted the dictionary definitions of these words so as to obviate any personal subjectivity around the topics. The definitions of these words have not been questioned by any of those who disagree with what I am writing and yet I am using *both* terms as they are defined. I agree, it is utterly autonomous for an individual to choose heteronomy, absolutely: there is an entire planet full of individuals making this choice. It has inevitable consequences, this path, and that is entirely within their individual rights to choose this path and outcome. I repeatedly state that this is not the area of discussion that I am interested in- I am not interested in engaging with those who choose heteronomy and then wish to justify their decision- what is there to justify or defend? What seems to be the issue is that individuals do not like what they have chosen to be *identified* as heteronomy even if this is what they have chosen- they wish to choose one thing and insist that it is the other. The thing is not allowed to be properly named. Um, ok, so don't discuss this with me, because I'm going to keep pointing to the thing and call it what it is- and this apparently is somehow challenging their autonomy.

Does this mean the issue is that I'm challenging their autonomous right to call heteronomy whatever they like? This does not work for me, because then all that's recreated is the domination and control of the church in times gone by- it's not called murder, it's 'god's righteous will'. Blah. I'm not going to do that. So I have no issue if individuals want to call one thing another- they are free to create whatever threads to do this in, I will never set foot into their territories- but they're not satisfied with that. The church wasn't, either- it needed, demanded, that the natives kneel before their crosses and submit to the 'will of god' (or society, or the governor, or whatever other external authority they saw fit to install) and if the natives did not comply they were slaughtered. Every pogrom on earth has had its roots in precisely the same behaviour. I'm not a supporter because I'm interested in other ways that *don't* require victors and vanquished.

Someone commented:
To uses one of those cliches .... What's good for the goose should be good for the gander. To demand respect of one's autonomy without extending that same respect, first and foremost, is a farce,

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
I agree utterly, and if you can show me an instance of where I have taken this stance with anyone I will be the first to clear up the error. Every word I've written has been up for scrutiny and thus it should be easy to highlight where I have not extended the same respect for the individual to follow their own autonomy. I have experienced a lot of reaction to what I write but no actual dialogue or exploration, just a great deal of criticism from certain quarters.

The Native Americans, when they came into contact with the starving Puritans, extended absolute autonomy and equanimity to these out of place individuals (as in, no idea of how to survive in their environment); they showed them how to survive and thrive in their environment. History has recorded how the Puritan settlers rewarded their Native American neighbours for their extension of autonomy and kindness. I do not personally extend the fullness of anything towards another until I know what sort of Being I am dealing with, who they demonstrate themselves to be, if their actions are backed by integrity and cohesion: if this automatic extension of autonomy is desirable then there can actually be no complaint regarding the actions of the President, for example, because it can be artfully argued that his actions of heteronomous dictatorship are entirely within the scope of his personal autonomy. It gets ridiculously convoluted and I don't go there: personally for me it is simple- is there integrity and cohesion, or not? If I am unsure, is this individual one I can openly discuss my perceptions and questions with, or not? If they are not the sort of individual with whom such conversations can be productive and co-creative, why would I do so? I would not, even though some would be absolutely quick to suggest that I am being 'judgemental' by choosing not to engage.

Someone commented:
for the first thing that I understand about the nature of autonomy itself is that in it's true sense, it can never be threatened or taken away, not if one truly holds it.

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
Absolutely. I agree utterly. This, however, does not mean that autonomy will never uphold a boundary. Upholding a boundary frequently is interpreted by those who resent the boundary as infringing upon their autonomy, or 'defending' one's Self or any number of negative interpretations. I'm aware of this.

Someone commented:
Every effort should be, not to defend it, but to extend it, and bless it in every other who comes along, which to my way of thinking will lead to it's promulgation amongst those who might be ready to receive something that might lead them further along their own parh to freedom

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
I fully accept that this is your understanding and subjective experience. It's not mine. There have been many, many historical instances of peaceful, welcoming individuals endeavouring to raise the vibration of other individuals by example and tolerance; many of those peaceful Beings ended up dead or brutalised. I fully uphold your inalienable right to make your own choices around this; I would never suggest that you 'should' do what I do, or 'should not' do something else- that's not anything that would occur to me. I utterly accept that in your way of thinking extending a high level of autonomy towards all Beings will be the opportunity for those who 'might' be ready to receive something. I have been doing this in my own way here. I'm getting the result of this. I keep holding out my hands and saying 'look, if you don't like what I'm saying I accept that, it's nothing *personal*, I am just one Being and you don't have to listen to a *single word I say*, it's really easy!'. Apparently it's really easy to *my* way of thinking, not theirs. Ok.

Someone commented:
Given that, in my understanding, every person is potentially an autonomous being, I should endeavor to facilitate every person in reaching such understanding within themselves, which to my way of thinking will not be served by trying to constantly illustrating where the other person is not. Show them, from where they are, how to get to where they are going.

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
I appreciate your sharing your perspective and path with regards this. I will keep writing, and triangulating my perspective, and being careful to use and refer to the dictionary definitions of things with a view to discussing the ideas. I utterly accept that this is your understanding and that you feel called to this way of doing things.

Someone commented:
With much love, I present my thoughts on the matter.

Songsfortheotherkind replied:
Thanks for expressing your perspective and path.

-- songsfortheotherkind

Re: So how much transformation is actually wanted, really?

The hidden languages of entrapment.

There are many committed and sincere individuals in the 'freedom' movement who have spent decades trying to work their way through the entanglements and contortions of legalese. It took many years for these seekers to realise that there was a hidden and encoded language layered beneath the seemingly obvious meanings of the words. "Do you understand these charges against you?" has nothing to do with 'understand' in relation to comprehension- in legalese, 'understand' means 'stand under', a legal term meaning that the individual not only agrees to and accepts the charges against them, but that the individual also accepts the jurisdiction of the court as having authority over them. This is a *profoundly* different meaning to the one the ordinary individual believes is being used when they say 'yes' to the question. In terms of the controlling mechanisms of the current paradigm, the entire miasm is filled with such 'weasel words', words that are designed to bespell or enslave an individual into a situation that, in terms of technicality, they have actually agreed to. It is an entanglement that, if one takes it on face value and seeks to answer in its own territories, is doomed to failure- the freeman and sovereign movement is filled with examples of those who tried to turn the law's weasel words on itself only to find themselves incarcerated for their efforts and frequently having lost everything in the process.

I spent two and a half years, averaging 50 hours a week, delving into the weasel words of the law. I made connections with many individuals who were deep into the world, and the private world of the other law that operates below the 'public' arena and that does not use acts and statues as its operating platform; in partnership with my friend and colleague we were responsible for private equity documents that ended up coming back to us as 'you should see this, this is amazing!' because others didn't know we'd created it. I know my stuff in that realm. I know how deep it goes and I kept looking for a much deeper signal.

I began to learn the hidden legalese for 'human being'. It was so disturbing that on two occasions I had to walk away from the studies because of the distress what I was learning was causing me. I found reference after reference to 'cattle, property, chattel, collateral' and in several very old books found much uglier references; I was inspired to go looking through the law definitions in my own country and search for what was being used here in Australia. Here is one example I found:

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/n...tic_goods_laws

4 Definitions

(1) In this Act, unless the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires:
"Advisory Committee" means the Poisons Advisory Committee constituted by section 6.
"Analyst" means an analyst appointed or taken to be appointed under section 37A.
"Animal" means any animal (other than a human being), whether vertebrate or invertebrate, and includes but is not limited to:

(a) mammals, birds, bees, reptiles, amphibians, fish, crustaceans and molluscs, and

(b) the semen, ova or embryo of an animal (other than a human being) or any other substance or thing directly relevant to the reproduction of an animal (other than a human being).

For any individual remotely familiar with the position animals have in terms of the law, this was a profound revelation. I began to trace the interlinking connections between the various definitions contained in different laws and over a few months a pattern began to emerge, one in which human beings , by their own willing acceptance of the external authorities, had *in terms of the law* given away their autonomy and sui generis rights and agreed to be things rather than Beings in return for being taken care of. I moved this information around in many different ways, for quite some time, and began to look in other directions for remedies. What I kept coming across were repeated references to a state of Being that put an individual completely *outside* the paradigm's laws and dictates. It was in this realm that I came across the term 'sui generis', which is a legal term that is known to the upper courts. The upper courts recognise the living, autonomous Being as being *outside* their jurisdiction. There are many, many reasons for this and many cross-referencing laws, statues and equity principles, and one of the foundational concepts is that the law recognises that it is not a living thing- modern courts are *corporations* and have been since ecclesiastical courts were replaced, although in the strictest sense even ecclesiastical courts were corporate and recognised this on a deep level. There have been contortions after contortions with the baseline view held as the operating platform- the average individual constantly gives away their spiritual autonomy in return for an illusion of being taken care of by an external authority. I began to investigate the concept of sui generis and came across other interconnected terms- autonomy, absolute- that indicated a way of Being that had at its roots a profoundly spiritual perspective and foundation. Essentially, the entirety of the law is created upon a knowing that individuals do not want real autonomy- and every time an individual engages with the controlling authorities it is from this position- as a no-thing, as one who has been declared property and under dominion- that all actions spring. The individual is always the trustee, never the beneficiary- and the trustees *always* pay- have you noticed that inmates in prison are called trustees?- there are all these multilayered traps that exist because the individual allows the entrapment.

There are many, many ways that this allowance happens. There are many rationalisations and explanations for it. The rationalisations and explanations do nothing to free the individual from their situation and as actual transformation is what I am interested in, I was looking for what actually *works* in terms of answering the entanglements of the system. I kept coming across the same references again and again. These became entwined with concepts and platforms that I had been born with but had never been able to discuss because of the extremely triggered responses that I encountered until I began to speak about the sui generis, the autonomy and the interlinking of these and the undoing of the construments that have been pointed at society for a very, very long time. These entanglements are not just legal- they are on every level of existence: spiritual, physical, mental, psychological and biological. They are utterly insidious and the undoing of them has *nothing to do with laws, or reforming laws, or revolutions, or arresting bankers, or shouting slogans, or voting in a different prison guard*- the remedy is in truly knowing and living into being a sui generis, autonomous and absolute Being. This has many aspects and the law has partly been created as a *detection device* regarding those that claim to 'know who they are'; there are many youtube videos that demonstrate the dubious nature of going into a court and claiming one's Self as 'sovereign'- if it were the answer, this would work, but it frequently does not. The interesting question around that is 'why not'?

The truly autonomous Being, the Being who *utterly and completely groks that they ARE their own authority, their own jurisdiction, their own alpha and omega points, the captain of their vessel, their own conscience, the Creator of their own life's path- such a Being never *argues* their autonomy. There's utterly nothing to debate. They'll engage to a certain point *and* they will never 'defend'- there is a world of difference between holding a discussion and defence or argument, both of which are deeply embedded in legalese and have powerfully disempowering meanings, if one investigates them from the legal perspective. A Sui Generis Being is one who is utterly, totally unique, not animal, not chattel, not property- they are a law and authority to themselves, with a jurisdiction that begins and ends with themselves- and the law can tell these Beings from the general. The terms 'general' and 'special' are also deeply embedded law words that absolutely govern the way an individual is perceived and treated, *and* if the individual does not know who they really are then they remain in the 'general population', which is fundamentally translated as 'property'.

I have been striving to triangulate in many ways the importance of the true autonomy as activates this undoing mechanism. It's impossible to discuss without having a solid foundation and I've been endeavouring to create the platforms for moving into those discussions because I thought there was in interest in this, I thought that evolution was a subject of interest. I now recognise that establishing such a platform is currently impossible and so I'm going to write how I have come to see things and how they interlock in my mind without attempting to engage the discussion as much. I am deeply interested and absorbed by the connections I've been shown, on many different platforms, and how they all interlock. The key has always been fundamentally spiritual *and* it has utterly nothing to do with any form of philosophy, religion, spiritual 'wisdom', gurus, dogmas or external authorities of any kind. This is what I'll focus on exploring.

-- songsfortheotherkind

Re: So how much transformation is actually wanted, really?

Now, go back to the conflict that you first mentioned and look at it from my perspective: to me, the constriction of your natural ability is unnatural to your Being in itself, not part of the evolution Consciousness signal as you naturally would express it and therefore, *to me*, part of the expression and intention of the virus.

I am *not* here saying that the emergence of the virus is some kind of expression of 'evil' or any of the other concepts that religion is interested in pimping, that state of rigid duality, black and white: *to me*, the emergence of the entire system that created the virus in the first place is all ultimately part of the evolution signal its Self, because the evolution will *always* occur, regardless of how hard any individual or group is striving to prevent it: there's nothing going on here that 'shouldn't' be happening and at the same time, that doesn't mean that it's the *best option* either. Just as with all parasites and viruses, we have choices: we can create a symbiotic balance with it, in which we're never really well but aren't sick enough to stop being a host- religion, philosophy, government etc are ways that this sickening and draining symbiosis happens; we can be overwhelmed by the virus parasite and die, either spiritually or physically (and the former leads inevitably to the latter) OR we can use our spiritual/energetic immune system, get to know the symptoms of a virus incursion, pump our spiritual immune system to the max and dismiss the virus without nothing more than a mild temperature and a few cleansing glasses of superjuices. All viruses and parasites serve the evolution signal in that they challenge the immune and adaptive systems of the host with a view to either making these stronger, or discovering the weakness of the Being and exploiting it. So far, the collective has been trading autonomy for exploitation because of the perceived benefits of such exploitation, which in essence are nothing more than chemical tricks caused by the parasite itself, like toxoplasmosis chemically convincing the rat that the cat is the sexiest thing it's ever seen so that it will go and get eaten by the cat: all part of the parasite's plan and purpose, but not so great for the rat. Perhaps a more critical eye at the Great Green Head is in order, because at the foundation is a bunch of chemical and psychological contortions with a specific purpose and intention that is NOT positive to the host.

This is a glimpse into this world as seen by my mind. ANY preacher, no matter how cosily they are preaching, no matter how 'friendly' and 'helpful' the 'adjustment' they are attempting to assert might seem to be, no matter how 'spiritual' or 'enlightened' they may present themselves to be, ALL preachers are preaching nothing but the heteronomy: religion, philosophy, psychology, education, government: all are designed to force or entice the individual into giving away the thing of TRUE value, the creative power within them that is expressed in part as the individual's autonomy. That's what I look at, constantly: everything I experience is filtered through the overarching theme of 'is this something designed to siphon off my autonomy?'. I hold the lens of autonomy up to everything, like the stone in Spiderwick Chronicles: I got used to everything of the system looking like hideous toads underneath all the contortions and self serving and smiling manipulation disguised as 'helpfulness' or 'caring' or 'authority' or any of the myriads of other tactics the virus uses. For me personally, the bottom line is simple: if applied to its greatest expression, is this idea/concept/philosophy/platform just another fertile ground for the re-emergence of the heteronomy? Unless the expression is founded absolute in autonomy then the answer has always come back to me as 'yes', in which case everything halts there, my dragons at the gate, and the infected material cannot pass, no matter how precioussssssssssss it is to the host or how elaborate a rationalisation can be made for it.

Virus infected concepts only have two paths: in one, there are elements of the concept that can be resuscitated from the grip of the poison, detoxed, left to recover in a sunny spot in a comfy chair for awhile and then reintroduced to the signal; in the other, there's nothing but immune system response and natural dissolution, death and release of the energy back into the All to be recycled back as a less closed system form. There's no such thing as 'it's only a little bit infected'- try telling that to the Native Americans who died from blankets that were 'a little bit' infected by smallpox. As physical Beings who encounter viruses and parasites, we fundamentally grasp the nature of these things and we get that there's no such thing as healthy co-existence with a debilitating and draining parasite.

That's where I come from. I'm not here to make the lie more palatable, I'm here to call things what they are and reject the complex entangling- spiritual, physical, legal, psychological and energetic- that the virus creates. It's the system that has created the miasms and matrix we currently find our Selves in and for me personally, I've got waaaaaay better things to do, to create and to Be.


Quote I was referring to this, plus any general aspects of emotion-based Fear, as well as the programmed-in 'virus mind' , as all being the 'ego' above as causing the limitations and restrictions to other aspects of awareness. If other aspects of the self-directing and self-determining Self are part of the definition of ego, then I agree with you I need a different term for what I was pointing to...
Now you know a bit more about how many pieces I hold in my head at one time regarding this issue: what I've written about are just a few of these elements, so when it's being discussed perhaps now my 'fnurgh, clunk' element can be seen as possibly something OTHER than others thinking I'm arrogant. *wolfish grin at you*

I need to go make breakfast now- this came off the top of my head when I woke up.

-- songsfortheotherkind

verbal manipulators and emotional Hannibal Lectors

can't remember if this one has been logged here, but I love it so I'm doing it again.

I loved what Borden wrote before this one was posted, his responses to the provocateur at the time were awesome. It was moments like those that reminded me how Shiny he could be.



on abuser tricks and mind virus servants.


One of the thing that my law studies put me onto was the fascinatingly hideous way that language is contorted in the legal realm: nothing is what it appears to be, a word that in ordinary speech is innocent and clear becomes the carrier of a contortion that can send an individual to prison for a very long time. Lawyers are fully aware of this, and they are aware that ordinary individuals are utterly *unaware* of this language; they know that an individual is contracting into something that they really don't understand, and lawyers are sworn to both uphold the secrecy about these 'tortious conversions' (which means, essentially, twisted contracts) *and* are sworn to uphold the interests of the court, not their client- so when the courts are run by corruption, the court's agents become the duly sworn and obedient carriers of intentional corruption and deception.

The entire system we are surrounded by functions on the same deception and double speak: hidden languages that are used to manipulate and construe others into corners, prisons (real and internal), subjection, submission. It's the language construct that grooms the individual to BE dominated, subjected, manipulated, helpless, cut off from their essence like the child victims of the adult agenda in the Golden Compass and unable to navigate their own autonomy.

The Golden Compass is a brilliant book for getting clear on just what the true intention is of those who promote heteronomy (the subjection to an external authority of any kind) and why that is: interestingly, it isn't until right at the very end of those books that the virus rears its ugly little head and delivers the nasty sting. Until then, it's a brilliant mirror and even in the stinging is also a brilliant mirror, just of a different kind.

There is a subtle manipulation of the use of language that goes on with those who are coming from a hidden agenda. I learned this from my long and intimate associations with psychological/emotional/physical abusers of various colors. I began to observe an interesting pattern with abusers and the use of language to achieve their aims and agendas, which have nothing whatsoever to do with connection, a genuine and sincere interest in the other, a willingness to own their own crap, an honesty about their own crap: no, the agenda of an abuser is much different than this. It's about domination and maintaining a position of power over the one their efforts are being targeted at.

There's a brilliant book by Patricia Evans, “The Verbally Abusive Relationship – How to recognise it and how to respond” that I discovered some years after I'd begun to map the vicious, devious and manipulative way abusers use language. This book helped me to understand language patterns that I had picked up from the abusers in my life and also how this language was being pointed at me by my then partner. It helped me understand the many ways that seemingly straightforward verbal communications were being turned into painful quagmires and bewildering full artillery assaults. The elements that are pertinent to what I'm crafting in this post are the ones I'm going to quote, but if you're interested go here http://married2mrmean.wordpress.com/...-verbal-abuse/ to discover more.

There is a world of difference between the blunt instrument abuse of the not very intelligent and the subtle, many tentacled abuse of the highly intelligent and aware: think the difference between the common street thug and Hannibal Lector.



The psychological Hannibals aren't interested in the easy targets; they might engage them in passing but it's only on the way to their real focus- there's no victory in kicking a puppy. The real attraction lies in the signal that is strong, and intelligent in itself; that's where particular types of abusers are going to be attracted to. The Hannibals know masterfully how to insert themselves into the environments they stalk; they are the charming and attentive man at the beginning of the relationship, a listener, witty, kind, helpful.

In the realm of abuse psychology, this is called grooming. All abusers do it, it's one of the ways that they identify themselves over time, to the observant eye. They go into their chosen realm, be it a relationship with an individual, a group, an organisation or an entire country, and they're playing the part. They all know how to do it because it's part of their skillset that supports their agenda. It's the mild mannered exterior of the serial killer living quietly in an unsuspecting suburban setting, nodding to the neighbours with a slightly shy and awkward smile, the boy next door patting the dog and calling everyone 'ma'am'; it's the cultured and urbane exterior of an internally hissing and slitherin' monstrous nature that seeks to consume others for the sake of nothing more than self pleasure.

Of the fifteen markers mentioned in the link I've posted, there are some specifics I'd like to have a closer look at. I'm going to change the words so that the idea of 'relationship' is broader and I don't use the word 'victim'.

2. COUNTERING -
As a category of verbal abuse, countering is one of the most destructive in a relationship because it prevents all possibility of discussion, it consistently denies the [other]’s reality and it prevents the one from knowing what the other thinks about anything.

An abuser who constantly counters seems only to think the opposite of [the other]. If she (or he) says anything directly or expresses thoughts on something, the abuser will say it is the opposite. What he is really saying is “No, that’s not the way it is” even about [the other's] most personal experience of something.

This shows up in interesting ways that are connected to the next one, discounting.

3. DISCOUNTING-
Discounting denies the reality and experience of the [other] and is extremely destructive. The verbal abuser discounts the other's experience and feelings as if they were worth nothing. He will say something that gives the message “Your feeling and experiences are wrong, they are worth nothing.” Such as – “You’re making a big deal out of nothing, you always jump to conclusions, you can’t take a joke, you don’t know what you’re talking about, you take everything the wrong way.”

In combination, these two are potent. When the abuser is using intellectualisation as a further platform for discounting and countering, they can cloud the situation in a storm of noise that is intended to confuse and silence the other. The idea is never true co-creation, connection, genuine heartspace and communication- it's about the agenda of the abuser.

In a forum such as this, abusers are going to reveal themselves through discounting words that either blatantly or more insidiously discount the reality of the other as being in some way less than the position of the abuser; they point out the 'reality' of the other's experience, they demonstrate how it's *really* this inferior thing here, that the abuser has the 'true' knowledge and understanding while the other is just someone in need of some kind of enlightenment that, funnily enough, the abuser can provide and is going to do so, whether such 'enlightenment' is requested or not.

7. JUDGING AND CRITICISING -
The verbal abuser may judge the other and then express his judgement in a critical way. If the other objects, the abuser may tell her that he is just pointing out something to be helpful, when in reality he may be expressing his lack of acceptance of her.

Most verbal abuse carries a judgmental tone.

Statements which begin with “The trouble with you is…” are judgmental, critical and abusive.
Statements which begin with “Your problem is….” are judgmental, critical and abusive.
Critical “stories” about your mistakes or actual lies about you which embarrass you in front of others are abusive.

'Helpful' comments designed to 'correct' thinking, particularly when such advice has not been requested, are abusive. Continuing to blanket a perspective at any individual who has specifically requested that such perspective be left out of the equation is abusive behaviour. These behaviours come from a mind of molasses designed to crabpot others back into the line the abuser thinks others should be in- subjected to the abuser's world view. Every time a superior position is taken, the individual is revealing their true nature and intention, which in turn reveals them to be nothing more than an obedient servant of the viral program of hierarchy, heteronomy and domination.

It's everywhere around us. It's one of the reasons language transformation tools such as Non-Violent Communication (NVC), compassionate communication and others have been created; there is the growing understanding that within the mechanisms of language as its currently used, the seeds of domination, control, subjugation and other abusive patterns are carried. These new ways of communication are a response designed to explore the possibility of a language that is empowering and honoring of the sui generis of all Beings, giving each individual the tools necessary for the psychological aikido one needs to send aside the distortions of abusers and the virus.

As a lover of the sui generis, I am also a lover of truly powerful and clear language that allows no space for language to be used to deny or distort the Being and expression of another. When an individual brings that sort of interaction into a space, they are flagging their true intention, agenda and purpose. Sui generis language seeks to honor the experience of *all* Beings, to create bridges wherever possible, to create the space where seven billion different perspectives are not a cause for conflict- actually, the space of infinite possibility manifesting itself constantly without there being any conflict necessary- that's what I'm interested in and what the majority here at the Pub are interested in.

Any use of language that, covertly or overtly, reveals a negative intention and purpose towards another, or that demonstrates the hallmarks of abusive patterns, is a way that the speaker reveals what truly moves inside.

Sometimes it's impossible, when you know the abuser style and aren't vulnerable to it, to not have a sense of mischief...



and that only goes so far.

The Pub was established as a haven from dogma. Those who insist on bringing dogma, despite being politely asked not to, reveal themselves to be agents of a different kind. There's only so long that the grooming can go on- eventually, the itch will need to be scratched- the thing that abusers don't quite get is that they are their own fleas, so they go questing for those to consume because they know they'll usually find them.

Sometimes, though, they wander into the wrong pub. They confuse a willingness to build bridges with a willingness to tolerate abuse. They confuse openness with gullibility. They confuse an obviously motley looking crew with a stupid motley looking crew. Even Hannibal eventually is undone by his own hunger. All abusers are because they serve their purpose and become redundant.

Sui generis level awareness. The best flea bomb in town.

_________________
"For every lie I unlearn, I learn something new"- Ani DiFranco

Only those who risk going too far can possibly find out how far they can go. ~ TS Elliot

My attempt at a synthesis of the writings in these fields