<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deconstructing the right to dominate via &#8216;democratic process&#8217; and other subjective despotisms.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://songsfortheotherkind.com/blog/deconstructing-the-right-to-dominate-via-democratic-process-and-other-subjective-despotisms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://songsfortheotherkind.com/blog/deconstructing-the-right-to-dominate-via-democratic-process-and-other-subjective-despotisms/</link>
	<description>Bringing forth the evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2015 02:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: new illuminati</title>
		<link>http://songsfortheotherkind.com/blog/deconstructing-the-right-to-dominate-via-democratic-process-and-other-subjective-despotisms/comment-page-1/#comment-13430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[new illuminati]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songsfortheotherkind.com/blog/?p=306#comment-13430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We often confer with advocates for global technocracy. When we ask, ;who will choose the scientific leaders&#039; or &#039;how will you decide which engineering plans to adopt&#039; their arguments revert to despotism.
Of course democracy is flawed. It&#039;s the worst possible system aside from all the rest - so far. Rights of individuals and of nature are not inherently incompatible with the democratic process - but they ARE incompatible with most other systems, including libertarianism and standard anarchist models for instance.
If we can agree upon that which we agree upon the rest will be easy!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We often confer with advocates for global technocracy. When we ask, ;who will choose the scientific leaders&#8217; or &#8216;how will you decide which engineering plans to adopt&#8217; their arguments revert to despotism.<br />
Of course democracy is flawed. It&#8217;s the worst possible system aside from all the rest &#8211; so far. Rights of individuals and of nature are not inherently incompatible with the democratic process &#8211; but they ARE incompatible with most other systems, including libertarianism and standard anarchist models for instance.<br />
If we can agree upon that which we agree upon the rest will be easy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
